Black Web 2.0 - Latest Comments in Bloggers Debate Anonymity vs Branding

Re: Bloggers Debate Anonymity vs Branding

Guest — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:58:56 -0000

Side note: That's why I don't publicly support sites like eVIPlist, which is a good site with great potential, but when I've contacted them to try to find out who's behind it, silence.

When Jasmine Crowe and I soft launched Hip Hop PR Wire, they were on my list of possible launch/media/publicity partners for when we push for a wider look (next month, I guess, my how time flies!).

That may not be a problem for them at all. But in the midst of a recession in a world in which people are launching new projects left and right, transparency remains an important tool for the true professional who's in it for the long haul.

Re: Bloggers Debate Anonymity vs Branding

Guest — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:51:56 -0000

I think so much depends on the blogger's long range goals.

I've had bloggers contact me who wanted to "collaborate" or whatever but they had a pseudonym online and were using it in their communication with me and that's where it ended.

And at least one of these bloggers was later griping about not getting support from other bloggers, though I was one of many who had written something about the blog, but we didn't know who he was. And he hadn't done anything substantial yet.

And now that blog's mostly dead.

It's one thing to be a gossip blogger and to live off snark. A pseudonym makes sense in that position. It might even be a good protective device and if you get really big, then unveiling one's identity can become part of the show.

It's another to be reaching out and attempting to form business relationships beyond link exchanges and tips o' the hat when your fake name is something like JoJo Dinero and you make big claims about what you do in your real life.

Ooh, yeah, let's partner up! Not.

Re: Bloggers Debate Anonymity vs Branding

Ananda Leeke — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:37:37 -0000

Great post. As an author and entrepreneur, I have use my blog and other social media tools for branding in my marketing strategy since 2005. It has helped me tremendously.

Re: Bloggers Debate Anonymity vs Branding

Viqi French — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:10:16 -0000

excellent write-up. i am ever grappling with this question. i have 2 blogs -- one to support my copywriting biz, the other to express my politics & cultural interests... guess i'll reveal my lovely face whenever Time magazine gets in touch with me. ;-D

Re: Bloggers Debate Anonymity vs Branding

Mark Mays — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:55:12 -0000

I was blogging under a jokey pseudonym just for the hell of it, mostly to separate my online identity from my print journalist ID. However, the two started to merge because of external forces. I don't blog regularly enough on my personal blog for it to really matter though, and I don't generally bother with the things we read are necessary to have a "profitable" blog. I suppose that could be because I was already a pro writer before blogging, or it could be that I just blog because I like to write rather than blogging to get a few seconds of fame.

Re: Bloggers Debate Anonymity vs Branding

Markus Robinson — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:12:01 -0000

That's a very good point. You would hope that someone's personal blog wouldn't impede on their job status (unless they were blogging instead of working), but I am sure it's happened. At the same time your blog could get you respect on the job, and showcase talents that your coworkers wouldn't have even known existed like the case of DJ Diva. I think you have to gauge how conservative your job is, and if your passion is worth the risk, then go for it.

I think overall using your real name helps you build a personal relationship with your audience, something people have come to expect from blogs.

Re: Bloggers Debate Anonymity vs Branding

Muhammad — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:51:34 -0000

The choice is on the blogger. However, without personal branding there's no Oprah, Tyra, Martha nor Ellen. If your are in it be in it to win it.

Re: Bloggers Debate Anonymity vs Branding

DJ Diva — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:08:00 -0000

When I started my new job in NYC after living in the South for two years...and someone said "Hey You're DJ Diva" and I had only been working here 2 days in a managerial capacity...I knew it was time to out myself. I had to shut down my personal blog and come clean to my bosses. They took it well and even paid for me to DJ the dept xmas party...They like to brag about having a DJ in the office...

Re: Bloggers Debate Anonymity vs Branding

Lamar — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:55:42 -0000

This is something we've been slowly doing on our personal blog (me and my wife). I figure you'll never make it to Oprah's couch with a pen name.

The anonymous thing was cool at first but now as we start to get more media attention it's time to step out.

Re: Bloggers Debate Anonymity vs Branding

Teech — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:25:26 -0000

Just curious: What if your blogger persona/content (or personal life) don't mesh well with your professional life? For example: a corporate exec who blogs about her religion. Its her personal life and has no bearing on how she performs as an employee, but the popular opinion of her religion could effect work relationshipsprevent her from getting hired. If she a coward for protecting her professional best interests? What about gay bloggers?

Re: Bloggers Debate Anonymity vs Branding

Shannon — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:11:24 -0000

Good article. Hopefully it starts a trend and more bloggers start to do the same. In this day and age too many people get away with murder by casting stones behind their computer screens. Bloggers should start standing up and holding responsibility for their actions and words or they will just be looked at as cowards.

Re: Bloggers Debate Anonymity vs Branding

Teech — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:38:21 -0000

I think "coming out" is a credibility booster as long as your professional credibility matches up. I contemplated the subject myself for a while.

Re: Bloggers Debate Anonymity vs Branding

nukirk. — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:30:52 -0000

Anonymity is good for starting out, but then when it does get popular, you might as well try to show the people behind it... that's if they have not already look you up!

Re: Bloggers Debate Anonymity vs Branding

m.dot — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:23:33 -0000

Funny, I am in the middle of moving from being anonymous to
writing under my legal name.

There are three reasons for this. A, I think I may self publish a book about the Crack Epidemic and distribute it via the blog, so branding helps.
B, in December, it was annoying explaining to people at blog related events that "I am M.dot" as opposed to just being able to be myself.

I also realize that in being visible, I am showing others how to do so as well.

Anonymity provided space for me to cultivate my voice. Now the voice is clear, and I can make myself known.

Re: Bloggers Debate Anonymity vs Branding

Nokware Knight — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:02:25 -0000

I think both, but the brand has to always be bigger than any individual blogger. Otherwise, the blog has no real longevity. If something ever happens to the blogger the the whole business goes kaput.

It's the same problem I have with moguls like Diddy. While he is a great self promoter and knows how to run a business, what happens when he can't work anymore or if he passes away tomorrow? The Bad Boy empire might as well die with him, because he has might it little more than an extension of himself.

Re: Bloggers Debate Anonymity vs Branding

Warren — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:42:38 -0000

It depends on the genre of blog. It's one thing to have a photo of yourself in the blog's sidebar or staff page, but I take exception to creating this entire culture of one's self, especially if you are a gossip blogger profitting from the exploits of public figures. So many Black bloggers are using the Perez Hilton model in order to get paid, rather than doing something fresh and unique that would warrant such branding.